Quick Search

857 Fire resistance of multi-storey car parks

Report ID: 857

Published: Newsletter 56 - October 2019

Report Overview

The reporter visited a recently constructed car park which contained some of the design issues discussed in the February 2018 SCOSS Alert on Fire in Multi-Storey Car Parks.

Report Content

The February 2018 SCOSS Alert on Fire in Multi-Storey Car Parks highlighted the risk of fire spreading between cars in a multi-storey car park. Fortunately, the car park where that fire occurred was constructed of reinforced concrete and had a fire resistance considerably greater than the minimum 15 minutes required by Approved Document B to the Building Regulations.

However, according to the Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Protection Report on the fire, the use of slots in the floors for drainage, combined with aluminium gutters and PVC downpipes allowed the fire to spread rapidly between floors and the structure was severely damaged.

The reporter visited a recently constructed car park which contained some of the design issues discussed in the Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Protection Report. They find it difficult to believe that this car park could survive for significantly more than 15 minutes in a fire without collapsing.

If a fire similar to the December 2017 Liverpool fire occurred in this car park, the reporter feels it is likely that it would spread even more rapidly and that after little more than 15 minutes, floor areas and the structural frame would begin to fail, allowing burning cars to fall on to the deck below. Complete collapse of the structure would probably not take long.

They go on to say that if the fire did spread rapidly, then firefighters could not enter the building to try to put the fire out, because of the danger of collapse. This would negate the assumption behind the 15 minute fire rating for multi-storey car parks, which is that firefighters should be able to get in and extinguish a car fire before it spreads to more than 2 or 3 vehicles.

The reporter also highlights that if the structure were to collapse, it might not collapse tidily onto its own footprint, and could instead fall laterally, discharging burning cars on to the ground well outside of its own footprint.

The reporter concludes that despite the publication of the SCOSS Alert in February 2018, this form construction is still permitted by Approved Document B to the Building Regulations and could be used for multi-storey car parks up to 30 metres high.


It is disappointing to hear that the lessons from the Kings Dock car park fire in December 2017 are in some cases not being learned for the design of new car parks. The SCOSS Alert on Fire in Multi-Storey Car Parks was published to help those who own, commission, design, construct, or maintain multi-storey car parks to learn the lessons from this event.

As recently as September 2019, there was a severe fire at a multi-storey car park in Cork which destroyed up to 60 cars and it was reported that the blaze quickly spread to other cars in the area. A worrying trend of severe multi-storey car park fires may be developing. In February 2018, there was a car fire on the 7th floor of the 100 storey John Hancock Centre in Chicago which was controlled by sprinklers until the fire services arrived, possibly preventing its spread to other vehicles.

Structural-Safety worked with the British Parking Association (BPA) to submit evidence to the technical review of Approved Document B of the building regulations in March 2019 which called for further research to be conducted into the risk of fire spread in car parks. In September 2019, MHCLG published the analysis of responses to the call for evidence, which for car parks stated that “There was wide support for a review of standards for car parks whether basement, otherwise enclosed, semi open or open. The nature of the Liverpool fire, some basement incidents and the changing nature of vehicles were all seen as in need of review.” The report states that the Government will work with industry and the Building Regulations Advisory Committee (BRAC) to consider the full range of technical areas raised in the Call for Evidence and determine a detailed plan for taking this review forward.

The reporter mentions compliance with Approved Document B, but it is important to remember that the structure must comply with the Building Regulations themselves. In particular, Regulation 8, Limitation on requirements, states:

Parts A to D, F to K, N and P (except for paragraphs G2, H2 and J7) of Schedule 1 shall not require anything to be done except for the purpose of securing reasonable standards of health and safety for persons in or about buildings (and any others who may be affected by buildings, or matters connected with buildings).

Note that Regulation 8 requires the health and safety of those ‘about buildings’ and ‘who may be affected by buildings’ to be safeguarded as well as those ‘in’ buildings. Safety depends on assuring the structure, as a whole, possesses certain attributes. One of these is to permit the safe escape of occupants, but as the reporter points out, safety for firefighters, minimising the risk of fire spread to neighbouring buildings and risk of structural collapse outside of the building footprint are others.


CROSS depends on you for reports - if you have experienced a safety issue that you can share with CROSS, please Submit a CROSS Report which is treated as confidential

If you have any comments regarding this CROSS report, please Submit Feedback

View other CROSS reports published in Newsletter 56

Email Updates

How to Report

Online submission:
Submit by post: