Quick Search

694 Dangerous balcony construction

Report ID: 694

Published: Newsletter No 49 - January 2018

Report Overview

During an investigation of a balcony construction, a reporter discovered serious inadequacies related to total lack of co-ordination between sub-contract work packages coupled with lack of appropriate supervision.

Report Content

A reporter has further concerns over site supervision and quality control during construction. During an investigation they discovered serious inadequacies related to total lack of co-ordination between sub-contract work packages coupled with lack of appropriate supervision. Invasive investigation and testing showed deliberately masked, very serious structural issues as follows. Concern had been expressed over the 'liveliness' of cantilever balconies but, despite the recent construction date, as-built records could not be located and Local Authority Building Regulation submission drawings were incomplete. Water penetration testing showed leakage through the balcony fixings and random removal of several primary connection bolts showed that there had been alignment problems. The secondary balcony steelwork was supplied and erected by a local fabricator, not the primary steelwork fabricator. Holes in the balcony steelwork did not match with holes in the main steelwork. The site remedy was deliberate machine tapering of Grade 8.8 bolts in primary cantilever connections subject to tension. Further investigation of a representative sample of numerous balconies indicated that the problem applied throughout. In many instances, the bolt tapering was excessive; so, to rectify further lack of fit, masking tape and building mastic had been utilised to hold bolts in position. In extreme cases of misalignment, bolt heads had been cut off, the threaded section discarded, and the heads tack welded over the bolt holes. Remedial works were carried out.

In the view of the reporter, the root causes of these issues are:

  • Principal Contractor emphasising 'Value Engineering' and the Client unquestionably accepting that 'value = minimum cost'
  • Fragmented design input with cost saving achieved by uncoordinated sub-contractor design and detailing with savings further augmented by limiting design team involvement/overall design control. Independent Chartered structural engineer involvement was limited.
  • Unreasonable cost and programme constraints and penalties on hard pressed sub-contractors

Comments

CROSS has had reports about balcony failures over the years as referenced below. There are frequent cases in the public domain from many countries, some constructed from timber, some from reinforced concrete and some from structural steelwork.  Balcony failures are usually sudden, without warning, and can result in multiple fatalities. Indeed, just before Christmas 2017 a timber balcony collapsed in Australia causing 2 deaths and injuries to 17 others. The integrity of cantilever balconies must be taken very seriously. Usually it is older balconies that fail so this reported case of balconies in a modern building that might have failed is quite shocking. The core reasons given by the reporter are similar to those given in the Edinburgh Schools Inquiry where a perfect storm of poor communication, poor construction and lack of supervision and inspection contributed to the failure of a masonry panel and repairs to many others. See the Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Construction of Edinburgh Schools February 2017and the summarised SCOSS Alert on Inquiry into the construction of Edinburgh Schools.Another SCOSS Alert: Structural stability/integrity of steel frame buildings in their temporary and permanent conditionin February 2017 gave as an example the failure of the City Gates Church building where the steel frame collapsed catastrophically. The most likely failure scenario, according to the investigation, was due to poor quality issues during construction. This type of behaviour on site has been reported to CROSS too often. There are just too many concerns being expressed of inadequate site construction, too many concerns of faults being discovered, and too many concerns of wide spread complacency. The report is another which is indicative of a fundamental pattern of danger within the UK construction industry and action must be taken to remedy the situation.

Previous CROSS reports on balconies are:

http://www.structural-safety.org/publications/view-report/?report=3105

http://www.structural-safety.org/publications/view-report/?report=4190 

http://www.structural-safety.org/publications/view-report/?report=4365

http://www.structural-safety.org/publications/view-report/?report=8613

http://www.structural-safety.org/publications/view-report/?report=8649

http://www.structural-safety.org/publications/view-report/?report=9048

 

If you have any comments or questions regarding this CROSS report, please Submit Feedback.

View other CROSS reports published in Newsletter No. 49


Register

How to Report

Online submission:
Submit by post: